HPAVC/HPAVC CD-ROM.iso/RJUPDAT2.ZIP/RJINTERV.IEW

Text File | 1996-01-01 | 31KB | 650 lines

Interactive interview with Rajaat
─────────────────────────────────

I found Rajaat at some .uk address while chatting on IRC. Since I at that
time had plans for releasing issue #7 and needed to fatten up it a bit, so
I asked for an interview and he agreed on doing one. While talking, it turned
out to be a very large interview, and I think it became more of a
conversation.

Since this interview was done, several interesting things that you should
be aware of has happend with this character. Some things written here
isn't correct anymore. Most important to be aware of is that Rajaat is
a member of a new viruswriting group known as Genesis. Genesis aim for
quality, and I'm happy to see that Rajaat is not a loner anymore and have
find a group in where he really belongs. You saw tb_bug by Rhincewind/Vlad
and Rajaat? Well, you've seen nothing yet..

This article has been edit by me to keep it as "clean" as possible.
There you go..

TU = The Unforgiven
RA = Rajaat


TU> You probably have read a few of our old interview's with a few other
    (fame) scene-guys, so, prepere for the same kinda questions as for
    starters.. . . 'Introduce yourself to the readers. . '

RA> I'm Rajaat, a newcomer in the virus scene and I hope to stay longer in here
    than all other virus writers from the UK, like ARCV and Black Baron.

TU> Yea, we can always hope so :). Do you have a question you would like me
    to ask because I don't have too much information about you (except from
    what I could obtain from your viruses/engines released)?

RA> Heh, you can always ask me why I started to write viruses or how I got
    involved in writing these things..

TU> Yea, ok. Let's take the normal questions as for now, and then I might know
    you better after a while :). So, why did you start write these kinda
    programs?

RA> Eh, as long as the feds don't get to know me better! HAHAHA! The reason I
    write these viruses is simply I got nothing better to do. After some
    incident I got kicked out of college and hanging out on the streets sucks,
    so I better stick to programming.

TU> Any specific reason to you were kicked out from school?

RA> Yea... :) It had to do with some account stealing (from other students) and
    releasing a virus in their directory (and infected their programming
    projects), that the teachers had to check (at home, eventually). HAHA
    These stupid goofs got fucked over so they couldn't judge us..

TU> How did you got caught in the first place?

RA> I was one of the few assembler programmers there and ofcourse my programs
    weren't infected :) And they found a list with hacked passwords in my
    drawer.

TU> Ah, okay, I see. . You said you had nothing better to do than to write
    viruses but why didn't you instead start to program something useful. Then
    people would appreciate your programs instead of being scared of them?

RA> I can't think of anything useful, most utilities are being written already.
    And, like you, there are people that like viruses.

TU> I don't like viruses, what makes you think that? ;)

RA> Why would you otherwise write Insane Reality? Or is it something you just
    have to? I just like to program them, it's a challenge.

TU> Now, you're the one asking questions :). So, let's continue. . . From where
    did you got your handle "Rajaat" ?

RA> If people know Advanced Dungeons and Dragons (a role playing game) they
    also might know the Dark Sun world. Rajaat is the one that invented sorcery
    there and he is the creator of the Champions, like Andropinis.

TU> Oh, I see. Has AD&D or role-playing in general influent you in any way when
    it comes to writing viruses?

RA> No, I just use the names to give my children (the viruses) a name, nothing
    more and nothing less.

TU> Isn't it kinda pervert to refer your viruses as your children?

RA> No, see it like this: I created them, I'm the father. I use Turbo Assembler
    and you can consider it the mother, ah, I don't know, but I feel like I am
    the father of them.

TU> Ok, I've heared stories about the viruswriters refering their computer
    to be their girlfriend and the virus is a result of love between the
    writer and the computer :). But that is another story, so is this also
    your motivation to write viruses, to create life and alternative lifeforms?

RA> No, I just do it out of boredom. I can't think of any useful programs to
    write and writing viruses may bring fame to me, and the UK needs a boost
    I think. It has been quite silent in here for a time.

TU> Hmm, think you already said that :). Yea, aren't you btw afraid to get
    caught by Dr.Solly and Scotland Yard computer-crime division or so?

RA> Ofcourse I am, but that will not stop me. I am hard to trace, because I
    don't be on #virus but a more general channel and not even using the name
    Rajaat. Furthermore the viruses I spread on school weren't made by me, so
    that should give them a hard time to find out.

TU> Which viruses did you spread anyways?

RA> The ones that are already very common, like Junkie and Tai-Pan.

TU> Funny, consider both of them are swedish viruses :). Hmmm, which kinda
    virus do you like (a few examples maybe) and which virus-writers do you
    look up to?

RA> Er... I don't have many examples, but I like the viruses of Qark (to whom I
    send Andropinis (anonymously)) and of Priest, but apperently he quitted
    virus writing. I don't have many idols, because I don't want to influence
    my programming with other techniques.

TU> Haven't you considred joining (or forming) a virus-writing group?

RA> Yes, I wanted to join VLAD, but the danger is that the more people do know
    me, the more chance I have to get caught in the end. It's better that I do
    contributions to various magazines using a anonymous account. I don't care
    if I work alone or not.

TU> Yea, that seems to be a smart move. Hmmm, how about contributing some new
    virus of yours to this issue as well?

RA> Sounds good. I still have some stealth bootsector virus here somewhere on
    my disk. I will comment it a little more and then DCC it to you, ok?

TU> Yea, send it to [e-mail]. What's your policy about destructive
    viruses, and how do you define destructive viruses?

RA> My opinion is that a virus gets more attention if it's destructive.

TU> I saw a polymorphic engine by you btw (Thanks for the greetings!), say,
    what kinda questions can I ask about that?

RA> Hmmmm.. I don't really know, it's not very polymorphic and should be easy
    to crack, but it was just made to make it impossible to use a scan string
    for a virus. I just used it myself once and that's it. I don't know if
    there are other viruses that use it. Maybe I will write one engine for
    polymorphic bootsector viruses HAHAHA!

TU> How to detect it then, with cryptoanalyze or something like that (or have
    you written detection for it yourself)?

RA> You can use cryptanalysis for it and it's also possible to trace the
    decryptor, like TBAV does. It's just that they have to do something more
    than usual to detect it. I think the better AV'ers will have no problem
    detecting it.

TU> Yea, stupid question of myne btw, I already knew that :). Hmm, which engine
    do you like the most? Hmm, know this (also) is a kinda stupid question to
    ask since it's like 25 (or so?) engines out there and nearly none of them
    is released with source-codes making it exteremly time-consuming to make a
    depth-in study of them all..

RA> I never bothered to look at them closely, indeed. The ones I liked however
    are DAME (of Dark Angel), the engine in Natas, the engine in Level_3 and
    TPE 1.4, but I don't have the source code of the last mentioned.

TU> Yea, so, why didn't you released the source-code to your engine?

RA> Nobody would use it, though. I think I will clean up the comments and send
    it to you sometime, I don't know. RTFM seems finished to me, and
    continueing it seems a waste of time to me.

TU> Ok, enuff about polymorphism as for now :). How would you descibe the
    perfect virus?

RA> A virus that takes to much time to detect (by a scanner) that it better can
    be discarded from it. ;) I don't think there will be the "ultimate" virus.

TU> Yea, polymorphism might be a step toward the right direction, but it's
    still far from the final solution.

RA> The engines of today prevent easy recognition, but they lack the protective
    mechanisms that are needed to conceal the virus from debugging.

TU> So, you think an utility that would support stealth, advanced-polymorpism,
    retro-functions of any kind would be a logical step to do?

RA> No. I don't believe in stealth techniques very much, except for bootsector
    and partition record infections. File stealth is too "fragile" to do. I
    believe in polymorphic engines than also generate polymorhic anti-trace
    routines, like the Ultimute engine, but more advanced.

TU> Hm, retro-functions and polymoprism might fuck the AV'ers and the
    researchers up, but for the normal user (the one's who get struck with a
    virus) it won't really matter. If they notice a virus they won't remove
    (or debug) it themself anyway (not in most cases that is). Then - stealth
    might be better for spreading purposes because they won't detect it in
    ages. . Like with Natas or a virus of that capacity. How easy is that do
    detect for the average Jow-Blow?

RA> Hmmmm, I still don't like it. Look for example at Andropinis. It's very
    easy to detect in .COM files, but there is also the MBR infection that is
    stealth indeed. If I have to use stealth on files, it would probably only
    hide the file size and I would not bother to write a heap of code just to
    make it also full stealth. (* Full stealth = disinfection/redirection on
    files as well, - ED *)

TU> The package you described above called "Ultimute engine" which Stormbringer
    (read: Black Wolf) wrote, what does it do?

RA> Oh, I didn't knew Black Wolf = Stormbringer! It's an engine that generates
    a decryptor peppered with some antidebugger tricks, but the way he did it
    can't stop the people who know debugging/tracing tricks well. I have a few
    ideas, but I don't know if I will make such an engine, but it's on my
    "to do" list.

TU> What ideas? Or is this private information? :)

RA> I'll tell you when the product is finished, I don't want to reveal anything
    until it's ready, as with my virus project I am working on.

TU> Ok, how about ART (Antigen's Radical Tunneler), any comments about it?

RA> I've looked at it and it looks very nice, but I won't use other peoples
    code in my viruses. I rather bother to make an own tunneler instead.

TU> What makes the tunneling code in ART so special you think? Isn't it a waste
    of bytes to use as much as 1407 bytes for tracing interrupts?

RA> Yes, consider this: you program a virus that uses ART (1407 bytes), regular
    code to infect COM and EXE files (maybe 400 bytes), bootsector and
    partition record infection (512 bytes in every case) and some stealth and a
    polymorphic engine (larger than 1024 bytes for sure). That will make a
    *huge* virus!

TU> Yea, but was that really an answer to my question? :)

RA> Let me put it this way. There are far more easier tricks that also work and
    that will take at most 400 bytes. I don't care if ART works with DosEmu of
    Linux. How many people will use that? I rather write a normal tracer that
    detects and skips TBDRIVER in memory. There are a few other monitors that
    block tracing, but TBDRIVER is the most common program used, I think.

TU> Yea, and it only takes about 15 bytes to disable tbdriver anyway, a lot
    of viruses does that, but do you consider it a waste of bytes to include
    ART for tunneling-stealth?

RA> Yes, I do. The idea was very nice, but it won't be used by virus writers. I
    rather use that 15 byte code you mentioned and then trace to the original
    interrupt 21h.

TU> Yea, ok. It's the same thing as with polymorphic engines; Noone will use
    them except for their creators, still Antigen released 2 versions of ART,
    but no virus using them. Hmm. Ok, let's go on with something complete
    different, shall we?
    (* Sidnote: VLAD#5 included a virus of Antigen which used ART, this
    interview was though done before vlad5 was released *)

RA> Uh, OK... (Eddie Murphy intonation (RAW))

TU> Ok ;). So, how are you in a private matter? As most news-paper would
    describe us (remorsless, rebellion teen with an attitude, a social failure,
    a malajusted misfit, a . . . . :)), or ?

RA> I'm a very quiet person, there aren't many people that like me, because I
    don't value properties belonging to someone else. Hence the virus spread on
    college. I didn't care if they lost their project because of that. The
    only thing I like is an escape from reality, preferably with booze or
    role-playing.

TU> Yea, "rather flee the (insane) reality of today, then facing it" :). So,
    how did your parents react when you was kicked out from school? Mine
    didn't like that very much I can tell.

RA> Hmmm. After their divorce they just fight with eachother about the house
    and the money and me and don't listen to me anymore. I can't talk things
    with them and when they found out I was kicked from school my mother just
    said I should not hang out on the streets.

TU> So, your mother wants half? :)

RA> Half of what? I don't like talking about it, it caused me a lot of pain.

TU> Uh, (Just a RAW joke, ya'know.. no worries!). Hmm (sorry!), So when did you
    start with computers and this sort of things?

RA> Hmmmm, I don't exactly know at what age I started (I think 12 or so), but I
    used a MSX at that time. At college I had to work with PCs, and to buy me
    off, my father purchased a computer for me (to get in favor again). Now I
    use his present to make viruses HAHAHA!

TU> You think he would approve?

RA> I don't know. I never told him and I won't care either. I rather leave my
    parents at once and live on my own.

TU> You seem to say "I don't care" often :)

RA> Why should I care about something if nobody cares about me?

TU> Probably because people only will care about you if you care about them
    in the first place?

RA> I once cared about my parents, you know. But after they divorce they seem
    to have forgotten they still had a son. And why should I bother cleaning up
    their messy life? But enough about that, let's continue talking about
    viruses.

TU> Sure. How many and which viruses has you written to this day?

RA> I have written 3 resident EXE viruses, 2 resident companion viruses (one of
    them uses interrupt 28h (dos idle) to infect as fast as possible), 2
    non-resident COM infectors (one using RTFM) and a multipartite COM infector
    (Andropinis) and now a stealth bootsector virus (Uniform).

TU> Quite some collection. . . Which virus group did you vote as no #1 as for
    VLAD#5, and how does your voting in general look?

RA> Vote? I didn't get a vote thing!

TU> Uh, ok, nevermind, it was a voting (kinda who's the best thing concerning
    groups, viruses, writers and so forth.. ), but ok, without your result
    being published, which group are you in favour of?

RA> I would rank VLAD as the best, because they are very inventive. The best
    virus I saw was Natas, it was very good programmed.

TU> Ok, now, let's discuss av-programs/persons and so forth so the AVers also
    can enjoy this thing, shall we?

RA> What do you want to discuss about them? You mean if I like some of them
    or not, if their program is good or not? Hmmm, I don't like AVers at all,
    they all bear some resemblence with Alan Solomon, so I don't wish to talk
    to them. The antivirus program I like is TBAV, F-PROT and AVP, the rest is
    not interesting, save for spoofing them with a virus.

TU> I agree you concerning the AV-programs, however I'm afraid that my attitude
    towards the AVers somehow has become better during the years - less hostile
    and perhaps less agressive as well. Hm, why do you have this
    bad-attitude towards AVers that hasn't done anything to you?

RA> They would if they had the chance to, I don't say I hate them, but I won't
    discuss things with them or even talk to them. They won't see me as a
    person, but as a virus writer, so I consider talking to them as a waste of
    time.

TU> Ok, what if I was a researcher as well, wouldn't you then talk to me
    either?

RA> I don't like dual edged swords, if you know what I mean. So, then I won't
    talk to you.

TU> Ok, before we continue then, sure I make an anti-virus to one of my own
    viruses, but released another better virus in the remover for it, would
    that be acceptable? (* This is the Petra-rm story.. *)

RA> HAHAHA! Why yes, ofcourse it does. Making a remover for a virus doesn't say
    you are a researcher, and spreading a virus in it is a great idea. I think
    I'll hack McAfees scanner for a virus of mine.

TU> Yea, that is a great idea I  think. But I did a lot of research before
    writing that virus, now - isn't that to be a virus-researcher? :)

RA> Yes, but not acknowledged. With researchers I mean Alan Solomon, Fridrik
    Skulason, Frans Veldman etc.

TU> Yea, AV-researchers that is. Ah well, nevermind. so what makes you think
    the AV-programs named above makes them interesting?

RA> The programs do their job, as supposed to. F-PROT has an accurate
    identification, TBAV has pretty good heuristics and AVP has very nice virus
    demonstrations in it.

TU> Any comments about VSUM and Patricia Hoffman?

RA> HAHAHAHHA!!

TU> That is suppose to mean that she is the biggest failure in the
    community?

RA> No, not exactly, she made money with it, so she is not a failure. But I
    don't value VSUM.

TU> Because of the oh-so-holy messed up descriptions of 99% of all viruses
    included within?

RA> Yes. I don't know how she manages that. She surpassed me with fucking up
    descriptions. I just described Andropinis very well, so she can simply copy
    it into her database. I don't like if she messes up descriptions of my
    viruses.

TU> No, who wants his children to be called cripples when they're not? Hmmm :).

RA> Definitely not me. I think she lost track describing viruses when the rate
    of discovered viruses increased rapidly. Hmmm, this turns out to be a whole
    conversation instead of an interview, but that's no problem :)

TU> When the viruses began to increase very rapidly was in 1992 or so I reckon,
    was you into viruses back then?

RA> No, I didn't write viruses, I just collected them. I even bought "The Virus
    Clinic" at that time. But he got busted by the beast.

TU> are you refering Alan Solomon as the beast?

RA> He is! He just does that to get his face in front of the cameras again and
    doesn't give a shit about the rest.

TU> I agree ;). Hence the articles published in IR#5. Hm, but what do you think
    about his program?

RA> I never seen it, just heard of it. It's supposed to be good, but I can't
    judge it.

TU> Due to the fact that you hate him?

RA> No, because I don't have his product. I don't hate him, maybe fear him is a
    more appropiate word for it. He's one bad motherf*cker.

TU> Ok, so have you been involved in any other 'underground' activity
    than virus-writing?

RA> I used to hang out often in #hack, but since I started writing viruses I
    left that channel to be more secure. I am not affiliated with any other
    activities, I just started writing because the UK was too silent.

TU> Well, not very strange due to the fact that Dr.Solly has succeded in busted
    pretty much about every virus-writer in the UK. I think you are the only
    english viruswriter left...

RA> Maybe there are others, I don't know. But I am certainly the only one that
    now surfaces, yes. Maybe the fact that I am the only virus writer in the UK
    makes me a bit famous. .

TU> Yea, and maybe this little thought-to-be-an-interview helps?

RA> I don't know and do not care either. I just felt like talking to you. Maybe
    it helps, indeed, and if that's so, it's fine.

TU> So, how has the 'scene' and viruswriting influent you in real life?

RA> It did not influent my life at all. Just instead of trading viruses I
    started to write them myself. I think that's all. I don't have many
    activities beside computing, except for drinking in a pub or so.

TU> You seem to spend a awful lot of time behind the computer because you can't
    find something better to do with your life. You think it's really worth it?

RA> I spend about 6 hours per day behind the keyboard, and about 5 days a week,
    with maybe the exception if there's a good movie on the television. Friday
    and Saturday are my "day off".

TU> Seems to me that your viruswriting is more or less a job than a hobby, is
    that right?

RA> It can't be seen as a job, because it serves no purpose at all. But I have
    to stand up, otherwise the United Kingdom will perish in the virus
    community.

TU> Say, so what purpose does a politican serve?

RA> Our goverment is real fucked up. Have you ever seen them? If they agree to
    something they shout "Yeah" and otherwise they make sounds like pigs.
    That's also a good description of them, pigs.

TU> Agreed ;). So what is your opinion about politicans trying to forbid the
    creation, spreading and even collecting/possesing of computer viruses?

RA> That will also include the victims of viruses, not just the underground.

TU> Yeah, ok - so remove the possesing then, do you think creation of computer-
    viruses should be considered a crime in any way whatsoever?

RA> They just make it illegal because they don't have other good defences. I
    think it's stupid. They can't do that, because they can't check everyones
    computer.

TU> Here we go with the clipper-chip again :). Hmmm, but see it as a matter of
    principle then - not in any use (like most other laws which only works
    theoretically), do you find it wrong or even illegal to create viruses?

RA> No I think it's perfectly legal to make viruses. What I do on MY computer
    is MY business, and not of the government, NSY or Alan Solomon! A law that
    is just theorie is also utter useless, because it can't be used then.

TU> What about spreading? Then the virus is not only on your own computer.

RA> If people want 'em, they got 'em. If unsuspecting victims get a virus, they
    probably did not take the proper defences. If they are ignorant to viruses,
    it's their own fucking fault, just like if you fuck without a condom you
    might get AIDS.

TU> I fuck without condoms :). Anyway - people know how to protect themself
    against real-life viruses (like aids), but can you really expect everyone
    to use bullet-proof anti-virus programs running TSR eating memory, or
    people to debug/disasm a program before running them?

RA> If you fuck without condoms that's your own choice. About users protecting
    their systems: they don't have to be ASM experts, just check the incoming
    (mostly illegal) programs or use an integrity checker, like the one of
    Wolfgang Stiller. That should keep out most of the viruses.

TU> Still it's viruses that could sneak by his program, does they also deserve
    to get struck with a (let's say) destructive virus, slowly corrupting their
    data, making them lose their jobs, etc?

RA> No, then IM (* Integrity Master - TU *) is a ill-designed program and
    should be improved. If a virus can sneak past it, it means IM (it's an
    example of a CRC program) is not doing it's job right. It's not the fault
    of the computer user then. And if he is in deep shit I don't really care,
    but they better choose another program then.

TU> Then who is to blame for them loosing their job (or whatever)? The creator
    of the virus who (let's say) uploaded it to a vx-board, the sysop of the
    vx-board, the one who downloaded it and runned it on his harddisk, the
    person in question who copied a shareware-program from the computer in
    question (without knowing it was infected), the author of Integrity Master,
    the system administrator who is hired to keep the computers secure and
    clean?

RA> HAHAHA! You won't trick me with questions like that! I am not to blame
    whatsoever. The sysop of the vx-bbs can't be blamed, because all his
    leechers know it's a virus. If the person that downloaded it runs it on
    his own system it's his own fault. The person that copies shareware
    and brings it to his work is out of line, but shouldn't lose his job for
    that. IM can't be blamed for the man losing his job, only for mal-
    functioning. The system administrator can't be blamed for the man losing
    his job either, but he is not able to do what he is hired for: securing
    the system.

TU> So, you're saying that noone is to be held responsible for him losing his
    job and even the whole fucking corporation being ruined and that it was
    all by a fucking coincidende? Like fate as some girl would have put it?

RA> HO! Now you make another assumtion. Now you say the whole company is
    ruined! That the man loses his job is a stupid decision of the staff. That
    also causes people not to tell about the infection and even infecting other
    computers to stay out of trouble. And who is responsible for Lloyds going
    to the edge of ceasing to excist? They had some bad coincidences, and YES,
    a virus could be one of them.

TU> Would you feel sorry if you had written the virus in question?

RA> Not at all. I really don't care what would happen. I would regret if a
    person in a hospital dies for some system fault, but not a company that
    spends money from the "Names" and can't even do that right anymore. A
    hospital is there to help people, most companies are there to get richer.

TU> How can one regret something that one never did? :)

RA> HAHAHA! My child did it, not me! :) You have some point in there.

TU> Ok, how can you miss something that you never had?

RA> You won't miss life after you are dead.

TU> Ugh, are you religious?

RA> I'm disappointed in religion. My parents married but now you see it doesn't
    mean shit. It's just some situation, and can be undone easily, but one of
    them got hurt. And that's not my father nor my mother, but me.

TU> You said above that you didn't want to talk about this incident, what made
    you change your mind?

RA> It just happened. The whole thing made me realise that marriage doesn't
    mean shit and that the ritual is a farce. The people that got better of it
    was the church and the lawyers. I used to be religious once and went to
    church every Sunday. Now I do not anymore, but I still believe.

TU> Hmmm, on channel #virus religion is quite a well discussed topics, so
    why do you believe? I mean it's not that you see any proof from a good
    god in today's soceity?

RA> Who made this world? We weren't able to do that. But we are made in his
    own image, that's why I create. But I don't like to discuss religion now,
    because then we could chat for hours and hours.

TU> Ok, let's have some quick discussion about religion anyways :). Then if God
    was good and created us (the human beings) from his own image, wouldn't we
    be good then as well? Or does this mean that you think mankind is good?

RA> How can you define good if there is no evil? One cannot excist without the
    other. "Good" will lose it's meaning if there's no "evil" to compare with
    it.

TU> Hm, nice words, but personally, I think it's just words invented by
    humans to be able to communicate better. Well, if you couldn't compare
    bad and good then everything would probably be defined as fucking
    perfect even though it wasn't, eh.. Like an Utopia or so. But since we
    have completely slitted opinions about this, we might not
    discuss this kind of things before we finish this interview. We don't
    want to argue, now do we? :).

RA> We can, but it's out of scope for the interview (it's not that anymore
    it's a discussion that became very very large) I think.

TU> Yea. Ok, let's us then stop talking about such things as religion.
    About that little hospital incident above, do you believe in poetical
    justice? Like if you die because of your own virus making the computers on
    the hospital when you're being operated in useless?

RA> If that happens I have nothing to worry about anymore.

TU> Ok, let's say that you instead of died got a nice wheel-chair for the rest
    of your life!

RA> Then I'd rather take my own life, I think. But don't you think you are now
    going too abstract???

TU> AH, sorry! I usually do :), when I get excited about something. . . .
    (* This wasn't ment that I got exited about Rajaat spending his life
    in a wheel-chair, btw.. I'm not that sick, really!!!) Hmm, ok, have you
    heard of any new virus writing techinques btw?

RA> Er... I think not. It's now just combining techniques, I think. Maybe some
    people will come up with something good, but I can't think of anything new.

TU> You think all virus-writing techniques for DOS already are invented?

RA> No, but I just don't know what to expect anymore.

TU> Ok, I better be going now, something else you wish to say but never had
    the oppertunity to say before?

RA> No, I think I have said what I wanted to say. I just will continue here and
    keep NSY (* New Scotland Yard - ED *) busy for a while.

TU> Any greetings you would like to send out?

RA> Oh, yeah! I want to greet VLAD and P/S. I think that's all.. Oh, yeah,
    ofcourse Immortal Riot! (* Thanks :)) *)

TU> Not any personal greetings or goto hell messages?

RA> HAHAHA! Yes, go to hell, Dr. Solomon! And personal greetings to Qark and
    Priest, might he ever read this.

TU> Hmm, okay, nice talking to you, see you around, (don't forget to send me
    that virus of yours), and keep up the faith! Taw-Taw :).

RA> Sure, it was nice talking to you, I'll message you if I spot you again on
    IRC, but don't expect me to come to #virus, I better stay out of there,
    Hermanni also is there sometimes and maybe there are other researchers
    there also.

TU> Yea, sometimes.. well, as I said, better be going, bye!

RA> Bye!